Which type of control would generally be preferred for extensive coordination before attacks?

Type 2 Control is the preferred method for extensive coordination before attacks due to its structured approach that allows for detailed planning and execution. This type of control requires that ground forces confirm that they are in the target area prior to fire being delivered, ensuring a high degree of coordination between air and ground units. This level of oversight is crucial when executing missions that involve potential risk to friendly forces, necessitating clear identification of targets, precise communication, and a well-defined operational plan.

In contrast, Type 1 Control is typically used when troops are in close proximity to targets, which requires immediate and often less coordinated engagement. Type 3 Control, though effective for multiple targets, does not require the same level of advanced notification and coordination as Type 2 Control. Type 4 Control is normally applicable in specific scenarios involving preplanned strikes against known targets, rather than the extensive situation assessment that Type 2 entails. Therefore, Type 2 Control is most aligned with the need for comprehensive pre-attack coordination.