Should JTACs/FAC(A)s respond to readbacks of a CAS brief with just "readback correct" or "good readback"?

The correct understanding regarding JTACs/FAC(A)s responding to readbacks of a CAS brief is that they should not merely respond with "readback correct" or "good readback." Effective communication in a tactical situation is paramount, and a simple acknowledgment lacks the necessary detail that ensures clarity and understanding between the JTAC/FAC(A) and the pilot.

When engaging in close air support, both parties need to confirm that all critical information—from target identification to engagement restrictions—is accurately understood and agreed upon. Therefore, requiring more detailed responses ensures that nothing is overlooked or misunderstood, which is particularly vital in a combat environment where lives are at stake. Clear communication helps to minimize the risk of errors that could result from ambiguous or incomplete acknowledgments.

This nuanced approach to communication is essential for maintaining operational effectiveness and safety.